Global manufacturers of lead‑acid batteries are confronting an acute antimony crisis after China’s recent export restrictions choked off much of the world’s supply of the critical mineral. Antimony, a key alloying agent that enhances battery durability and performance, has seen spot prices quadruple over the past year, thrusting producers into a scramble for alternatives just as demand surges across automotive, industrial, and renewable‑energy sectors.

China’s Export Curbs Cripple Antimony Supply

China supplies roughly 60 percent of mined antimony worldwide and processes much of the remainder. In late 2024, Beijing added antimony to its export‑control list, requiring exporters to secure individual licences for each overseas sale. By December, shipments to the United States were halted outright—part of a broader tit‑for‑tat following new U.S. semiconductor export restrictions. As a result, global antimony exports plunged to one‑third of their levels a year earlier.

The immediate fallout was dramatic. Buyers accustomed to relying on uninterrupted Chinese shipments found themselves locked out of official channels and forced into a burgeoning “grey market” where remaining inventories commanded sky‑high premiums—over $60,000 per metric ton, compared with historical averages near $15,000. Many lead‑acid battery makers, whose formulations depend on high‑purity antimony‑lead alloys, report mounting procurement costs that threaten profit margins and, eventually, product prices for industrial backup systems, automotive starters, and off‑grid energy storage.

Lead‑acid batteries remain the workhorse of countless applications, from starting combustion engines in cars, trucks, and boats, to powering emergency lighting, telecom towers, and off‑grid solar installations. Even modest increases in raw‑material costs ripple through these sectors, as manufacturers pass them on to original‑equipment producers and end‑users. For instance, logistics giants reliant on vehicle fleets are already budgeting for higher replacement‑battery costs, while renewable‑energy project developers face steeper bids for battery‑based storage.

Some battery makers have mitigated the shock by tapping recycled antimony‑lead alloy recovered from used batteries. Yet recycling alone cannot fully meet demand: consultancy Project Blue estimates the industry requires an additional 10,000 tonnes of high‑purity antimony annually to maintain battery performance standards. With existing scrap streams accounting for only a fraction of that need, companies are forced to supplement recycled materials with uncontested virgin antimony—now scarce outside China.

The shortage has also strained secondary suppliers of military‑grade equipment, where antimony plays roles in ammunition, night‑vision devices, and navigation systems. Defense contractors report that any delay or cost spike in antimony sourcing could complicate delivery timelines for critical systems, prompting some governments to classify antimony as a strategic mineral.

Scramble for Alternative Sources and Recycling

In response, battery manufacturers are intensifying efforts to diversify their supply chains. Clarios, the world’s largest automotive‑battery maker, recently announced feasibility studies for a $1 billion critical‑minerals processing plant in the United States that would extract antimony from imported concentrates and recycled scrap. Meanwhile, commodity trader Trafigura’s subsidiary Nyrstar is exploring antimony production at its South Australian smelter, contingent on government incentives to offset start‑up costs.

Other producers are investing in advanced recycling technologies. Emerging processes promise to recover higher yields of antimony from spent batteries, reducing reliance on primary mining. Still, scaling these operations requires significant capital expenditure and regulatory approvals, which can take years to materialize. In the interim, manufacturers are locking in multi‑year contracts with smaller producers in Africa and Latin America, albeit at premium prices.

Some mining firms are expediting exploration and development of antimony deposits in Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, and Bolivia, where reserves remain underutilized. However, bringing new mines online involves lengthy permitting, infrastructure build‑out, and environmental assessments—delays that offer little relief to industry pressure in the short term.

Government and Industry Response

The severity of the antimony crunch has prompted calls for coordinated policy action. In the United States, industry coalitions urge regulators to designate antimony as a critical mineral under domestic supply‑chain legislation, enabling incentives for onshore processing and stockpiling. Lawmakers are considering emergency authorization for strategic reserves, akin to those maintained for petroleum and rare earth elements, to buffer against future export shocks.

European battery‑manufacturing hubs are pursuing similar measures. The European Commission is weighing subsidies for local antimony‑processing facilities and streamlined permitting for recycling plants. It is also exploring trade negotiations with Australia and Southeast Asian producers to secure stable imports. Collective action by major economies may ease the immediate crunch, but most experts agree that only structural expansion of non‑Chinese supply can offer lasting security.

The antimony shortage arrives as global momentum shifts toward electrification and decentralized power generation. While lithium‑ion batteries garner much of the spotlight in electric vehicles (EVs) and grid storage, lead‑acid batteries still account for over 40 percent of stationary energy‑storage installations worldwide and serve as critical components in hybrid EVs. Persistent cost pressures on lead‑acid systems could slow deployment of off‑grid solar solutions in emerging markets, where affordability is paramount.

Automotive manufacturers, facing higher battery replacement costs, may also adjust maintenance and warranty practices. Extended warranties on starter‑batteries could become less tenable, potentially leading to higher out‑of‑pocket expenses for vehicle owners. Logistics operators might accelerate shifts to alternative battery chemistries or invest in dual‑technology platforms where lead‑acid batteries provide only backup power.

In military applications, sustained antimony constraints could incentivize research into substitute materials for specialized alloys. However, any viable alternative must match antimony’s unique balance of hardness, corrosion resistance, and casting performance—properties not easily replicated. As a result, defense planners increasingly view antimony supply as a bolstered criterion in procurement decisions, favoring suppliers with secure, diversified sourcing arrangements.

Outlook: Building Resilience Beyond China

Industry leaders caution that without decisive action, the antimony crisis may recur whenever geopolitical tensions escalate or export curbs reemerge. “We cannot be caught off guard again,” warns Steve Christensen of the Responsible Battery Coalition, urging a three‑pronged strategy: onshoring processing capacity, scaling advanced recycling, and forging strategic alliances with trusted producers.

Battery makers are already adjusting their product roadmaps, exploring hybrid designs that reduce antimony content or develop semiconducting additives to offset performance losses. Yet such technical innovations require rigorous testing and certification—a multi‑year process that offers little immediate relief.

As stakeholders race to shore up supplies and stabilize prices, the antimony shortage underscores the fragility of global mineral supply chains in an era of strategic competition. For battery manufacturers—and the myriad industries that depend on reliable power—building a resilient antimony ecosystem has become as urgent as any technological breakthrough.

(Adapted from MarketScreener.com)

Categories: Economy & Finance, Entrepreneurship, Geopolitics, Regulations & Legal, Strategy, Sustainability